I have news for and about our KIVA lending team, "Blue Star Wicca and Friends".
1. As
badseed1980 pointed out, we 've passed the $4000.00 mark. As of this writing, we are at $4275.00, in fact. This is amazing---particularly since the team has been in place for less than six months. I'm excited and proud of our work. Wooo-hooo!
Here's the link:
http://www.kiva.org/community/viewTeam?team_id=74062. KIVA has been involved in some controversy over the last few months. As Bill (our very own Gardnerian) pointed out, their transparency has been criticized, and with some merit. Many of the microloan organizations that post on KIVA have already fronted out loans to the folks whom they list. If the loan is funded on KIVA, all is well. But if the loan expires, the organization may suffer. KIVA has always explained this on its website, but they could have emphasized this information much more clearly, placing it front and center on the initial webpage (they've since altered their site in several ways to make this clearer).
I've had occasional unsuccessful loans refunded throughout my time on KIVA, and it's always made me a little sad. A good deal of the time, the loan was pre-made and the microloan partner has enough money to support it. In these lucky cases, the folks who have been listed on KIVA get their loans anyway. Sometimes, though, it doesn't work out---either there was no pre-loan or the organization had insufficient padding to support the borrower without KIVA's help. In these cases, the person/group whose loan has expired is just out of luck.
In a recent NY times article, one journalist said that the practice of "pre-lending" means that KIVA loaners aren't really loaning to individuals at all--they are just bolstering the grassroots microloan organizations that support them.
I don't think this is an accurate depiction of what's happening, but I do agree that KIVA should make it very clear that their microloan partners often make their loans in advance. Most importantly, I don't think that pre-loaning means that I'm not supporting the person I've chosen.
If I donate money to a small group doing a charity bike ride because one of them is a friend, does this mean I'm not supporting my friend? I don't think so. It does mean that I'm helping out a few extra people, but I'm OK with that. Helping a few additional folks is not a problem for me. If the biking group puts in their own money in advance, and my donation then reimburses them, I'm still OK with it---I feel that I've still offered support to my friend.
But I do understand that not everyone feels this way. I want to make sure that you know about this controversy so you can decide what you think for yourself.
You can read a blog post about this and find a link to the New York Times article here:
http://www.blogcatalog.com/search.frame.php?term=microloans&id=fa18a98ecc7ad256425159d3f95903be