Receiver, Transmitter, Ground
Mar. 21st, 2011 01:29 pmI spent the last year working hard to unravel a bunch of tangled threads, and in the process, I picked up a lot of unexpected insights. This morning's workout helped me to assemble some of them into a potentially useful pattern.
For a long time I've thought of human beings as wave forms: patterns of preferentially systematic color and sound.
Fairly often, I also think of us as antennas. I understand that this is both a description of what we do and a metaphor, and I don't expect it to map to the world exactly. The map is not the territory, but a good map---in this case, a good metaphor---can offer profound insights into how things and people work.
When I think about it closely, I've been using the antenna metaphor to mix up three very different kinds of functions: transmitting, receiving and grounding.
By transmitting, I mean the ability to broadcast a signal: an emotion/set of emotions, a thought/set of thoughts, a group of vibrations or a kind of feeling.
By receiving, I mean the ability to pick up these signals easily.
By grounding, I mean the ability to maintain a signal's form, to sustain it and keep it from varying too widely across a period of time: the ability to contain or structure a signal and thereby enhance its clarity and power. This has to do with keeping the signal steady and keeping it going.
The people I work with in FoV and Blue Star are mostly strong antennas. I've realized that in my private parlance, the code word for this is "priest". But they don't all transmit, receive and ground with the same skill, and neither do I.
I am an excellent transmitter. It's my biggest skill, both energetically and professionally. I transmit strong and proud, and I can be very loud, both energetically and verbally.
I'm somewhat better than average at receiving. This is probably connected with my background in anthropology and ethnography, and my inclination towards listening.
I am a terrible ground. Not an average ground, not a mediocre ground, not even a bad ground.
I am a terrible ground.
But wait, says my monkey mind, don't you get a lot of things done? Don't you sustain effort over time? Don't you hold yourself and other people accountable? Don't you love everything earthy, steady and material? That's ground, too.
Yes, I do, but I have lots of tools to help me do these things, and I love them precisely because I have to work so hard at them. To me, they are precious.
I compensate for the "gap" in my ability in a huge variety of ways: I schedule, I make checklists, I write everything down, I demand clarity in communication with lots of examples, I plug myself into an iPhone and pipe in carefully selected songs to ground and steady myself, and I meditate.
Also...I use other people to ground myself whenever I can. Usually, just reaching out and touching another human being for a few moments is enough, but different people provide very different levels of grounding.
Over time, I will gravitate towards those people who are clearly excellent grounds.
Excellent grounds are good. They are not particularly common, but when I find them, they are really good.
Excellent grounds who can also either transmit or receive are great---energetically, they "taste" amazing. They are even fewer in number.
Excellent grounds who are also strong transmitters and strong receivers are pure bliss. They are very, very rare.
For me, this explains a lot. This helps me understand why I respond in some ways to some people and not to others---and it helps me see more clearly what's going on, and what motivates some of my inclinations and actions.
I have to think more about it.
For a long time I've thought of human beings as wave forms: patterns of preferentially systematic color and sound.
Fairly often, I also think of us as antennas. I understand that this is both a description of what we do and a metaphor, and I don't expect it to map to the world exactly. The map is not the territory, but a good map---in this case, a good metaphor---can offer profound insights into how things and people work.
When I think about it closely, I've been using the antenna metaphor to mix up three very different kinds of functions: transmitting, receiving and grounding.
By transmitting, I mean the ability to broadcast a signal: an emotion/set of emotions, a thought/set of thoughts, a group of vibrations or a kind of feeling.
By receiving, I mean the ability to pick up these signals easily.
By grounding, I mean the ability to maintain a signal's form, to sustain it and keep it from varying too widely across a period of time: the ability to contain or structure a signal and thereby enhance its clarity and power. This has to do with keeping the signal steady and keeping it going.
The people I work with in FoV and Blue Star are mostly strong antennas. I've realized that in my private parlance, the code word for this is "priest". But they don't all transmit, receive and ground with the same skill, and neither do I.
I am an excellent transmitter. It's my biggest skill, both energetically and professionally. I transmit strong and proud, and I can be very loud, both energetically and verbally.
I'm somewhat better than average at receiving. This is probably connected with my background in anthropology and ethnography, and my inclination towards listening.
I am a terrible ground. Not an average ground, not a mediocre ground, not even a bad ground.
I am a terrible ground.
But wait, says my monkey mind, don't you get a lot of things done? Don't you sustain effort over time? Don't you hold yourself and other people accountable? Don't you love everything earthy, steady and material? That's ground, too.
Yes, I do, but I have lots of tools to help me do these things, and I love them precisely because I have to work so hard at them. To me, they are precious.
I compensate for the "gap" in my ability in a huge variety of ways: I schedule, I make checklists, I write everything down, I demand clarity in communication with lots of examples, I plug myself into an iPhone and pipe in carefully selected songs to ground and steady myself, and I meditate.
Also...I use other people to ground myself whenever I can. Usually, just reaching out and touching another human being for a few moments is enough, but different people provide very different levels of grounding.
Over time, I will gravitate towards those people who are clearly excellent grounds.
Excellent grounds are good. They are not particularly common, but when I find them, they are really good.
Excellent grounds who can also either transmit or receive are great---energetically, they "taste" amazing. They are even fewer in number.
Excellent grounds who are also strong transmitters and strong receivers are pure bliss. They are very, very rare.
For me, this explains a lot. This helps me understand why I respond in some ways to some people and not to others---and it helps me see more clearly what's going on, and what motivates some of my inclinations and actions.
I have to think more about it.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-21 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-21 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-21 07:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:some people have song cues
From:Re: some people have song cues
From:Re: some people have song cues
From:Re: some people have song cues
From:no subject
Date: 2011-03-21 07:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Semantics, honestly
From:Re: Semantics, honestly
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-03-21 08:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-03-22 01:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-03-21 07:00 pm (UTC)If that's what you mean, I'm not sure that's a virtue. The same things that keep us from experiencing the lows can also keep us from experiencing the highs, or so I've found in my life.
If I may stretch your electrical-engineering metaphor even further, I might suggest that what's can be useful is negative feedback (strictly in the engineering sense, not the sense of criticism): When a low approaches, start preparing to push things higher.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-21 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-21 07:23 pm (UTC)The priest stands in the east, and functions as the ground. He transmits and receives to and from the priestess, but energetically, he also performs this kind of "steadying and structuring" function that's hard to describe.
Sometimes, it's described this way: in a strong working pair, the priestess is the kite and the priest nails down and steadies the kite string. The stronger he is, the further and higher she can fly. Of course, this is a big simplification: he flies too, and she has to do some steadying as well. But to grossly generalize, each one specializes in that which they do best---ideally.
In the version I learned, these abilities are each associated with a sex/gender. Of course, I discarded this almost immediately: a good Blue Star priest can be either male or female, as can a good Blue Star priestess.
Best---absolute best---are people who can switch very effectively from one role to another. I know some people who can do this, and they absolutely rock.
I cannot. I am a beautiful kite and a less-than-beautiful kite holder. :)
no subject
Date: 2011-03-21 07:35 pm (UTC)And, let me throw in something I was taught (as well as I can remember it) - the summoner acts as a central peg for the priest to tie the string into ... I've always been taught to not lean as far forward, while summoning, as everyone else does during the quarter calls, in fact, almost to lean onto my back foot as an anchor point to help the priest find the center while he's helping the priestess get out to where she is calling from.
But, I'm just an egg, so far, and not practicing much, as I'm pretty much all alone here, near the Hindu Kush.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-03-22 02:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-03-21 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-21 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-21 08:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-21 09:36 pm (UTC)Amplifiers
From:no subject
Date: 2011-03-22 01:08 am (UTC)I have a strong sense that there is a correlation between this in BDSM practice as well.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-22 01:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-22 01:45 pm (UTC)I should ask her to do some translation work for me.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-22 02:53 pm (UTC)I struggled with the hints of these ideas that were in your Blue Star class on the four participants. I'm totally not getting it. I'd like to be a guinea pig too at some point. *squeak*
no subject
Date: 2011-03-22 03:16 pm (UTC)Don't panic---this is not as hard as it sounds. With verbal, auditory and visual cues it is easier than it sounds. I'll do it once, you'll do it once, and we'll do it again together. I can stand right next to you, real close, and let you *feel* it again.
And/or we can try this new technique.
Look, I promise it isn't anywhere as hard as drumming a rhythm and keeping it going for omg hours...
So you can totally, totally do it. We'll work on it together, and we'll repeat it again and again until it feels natural and easy and even comfortable. No worries, honey.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-22 03:19 pm (UTC)Grounding antenna
Date: 2011-03-26 10:39 pm (UTC)In my training, we talked about a piece of this as Holding the Sacred. There's sometimes that point in a ritual where there's a little bit of discomfort, or "spookiness", or the power is getting overwhelming, and the temptation to giggle, make a joke, or change the subject becomes very strong... but instead you choose to stay with the power, the weird, the uncomfortable, to try to know it and learn from it. It's about not running from the Mystery. Because sometimes even a whisper will shatter the sacredness.
The ancient Greeks spoke of the importance of being able to keep holy silence during the climax of the rite. I think this might have been part of that. I make my students do at least one ritual entirely in silence from beginning to end, working only in gesture, expression, and energy, to experience how different it is. It's powerful and more grounded than all the others they do, and it's always interesting to see, afterward, who wants to hold onto that silence for as long as possible... and who wants to break it.
Erhhh... Have some more thoughts rolling around about The Sacred Witness, absorbing vs. reflecting, and stuff, but those aren't in an articulate form yet. =P
Re: Grounding antenna
Date: 2011-03-28 11:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-03 08:05 pm (UTC)