Moral dilemma
Oct. 31st, 2011 12:47 pmIs there any group I will not talk to about my research? Am I willing to do book talks to any group that wants to hear what I have to say, include marketers?
The original deal I made with the women I worked with is that I would do everything in my power to tell their stories as widely as possible, so that their concerns and best interests would be attended to by decision makers in health care, policy and social service circles.
Based on this, if I am asked to speak to a group of pharmaceutical companies, do I say yes or no?
I really have to think about this. Today, I said that yes, I would go speak to such a group if asked. I laid out my agenda, which is ultimately to help facilitate the transformation of our urban health care system so that vulnerable minority women and men living with HIV (and other severe chronic illnesses) can thrive.
At this moment, I think it's important to speak my truth as widely as I can, within reason.
But do I trust that what I have to say will have always have the positive impact I desire? I have to think about this carefully.
My book is publicly available, and it offers the core of what I learned to everyone: it conveys all my key central messages, transmitting them through the medium of personal stories.
But...is there anyone to whom I will not speak, and/or any reason to refrain from speaking?
What would Pema say about this? What would the Dalai Lama say about this?
I need to pull out the Tao te Ching.
I have to think.
The original deal I made with the women I worked with is that I would do everything in my power to tell their stories as widely as possible, so that their concerns and best interests would be attended to by decision makers in health care, policy and social service circles.
Based on this, if I am asked to speak to a group of pharmaceutical companies, do I say yes or no?
I really have to think about this. Today, I said that yes, I would go speak to such a group if asked. I laid out my agenda, which is ultimately to help facilitate the transformation of our urban health care system so that vulnerable minority women and men living with HIV (and other severe chronic illnesses) can thrive.
At this moment, I think it's important to speak my truth as widely as I can, within reason.
But do I trust that what I have to say will have always have the positive impact I desire? I have to think about this carefully.
My book is publicly available, and it offers the core of what I learned to everyone: it conveys all my key central messages, transmitting them through the medium of personal stories.
But...is there anyone to whom I will not speak, and/or any reason to refrain from speaking?
What would Pema say about this? What would the Dalai Lama say about this?
I need to pull out the Tao te Ching.
I have to think.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 05:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 05:36 pm (UTC)You have an important message. You've already arranged so that others will see it. Why should marketers at pharmaceutical companies be excluded? They may react as if it were a new money-making marketing opportunity, but you don't know that, nor are you responsible for their reactions.
Tell the stories of those struggling women to anyone with ears to hear. Let others react as they will.
It seems to me that some teacher or other spoke to me about "differentiation." It had something to do with not allowing others people's reactions affect you. Who was that teacher? I'll send you her name if I remember it.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 06:04 pm (UTC)For me, an important question is: are you in a place where you feel able to maintain your integrity and the integrity of your message in an atmosphere you can't guarantee will be receptive to it?
Whether or not you feel up to it at this time is no indicator that you will or won't feel up to it some other time. We all need to ensure that we're living sustainably, so checking in with yourself about whether your internal resources are set up right for any activity at X moment in time is always good - and it's always value-neutral.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 09:33 pm (UTC)Also, you never know. You will be speaking to people... people with hearts and minds. Perhaps you will plant a seed, or nudge someone just a little bit- and change their heart, change their life.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 10:25 pm (UTC)I understand your reference to Taoism, perhaps not so much Lao Tse, but Chuang Tsu had a lot to say about giving advice to the powerful. Do it very carefully, without expectations, and only when you are fully at one with the Tao. Don't do it for ego, but i can see from your entry that you are way past that. (Yay!)
no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 11:13 pm (UTC)Who would not benefit from hearing you speak?
I would decline the invitation to participate in the Comedy Central Roast of Rush Limbaugh. Likewise, if Laura Shlesinger invites you to speak to the joint meeting of the Society for Immigration Reform and Wall-builders Union, that might be a good night to wash your hair. Focus On The Family's symposium "HIV: Government Lies or Liberal Plot?" probably won't let your book past peer review.
Even if what you say doesn't have the positive impact you desire, it's difficult for me to imagine it having a negative impact. Except it the obvious and unlikely cases above.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-01 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-02 01:03 am (UTC)Understand, there are days it goes badly. Around the folks who are stodgy and determined to be negative it really doesn't matter. What I'd ask you is what will enable your authenticity to shine? Do you need to share your message regardless of audience? Because on some level, you may very well reach a few lost souls.